i admire your post and your very firm stand on anti-abortion. however, as someone with a more neutral view on this topic, i cannot help but notice your post greatly appeals to emotions and sympathy rather then having a good premise for argument.

as such, it may come across as being too offensive, rather than serving its purpose in being persuasive

however, i do agree that women, especially young mothers, should bear much more responsibility and seriousness, not to treat their babies as commodities. with your basis of argument, you'd entirely disapprove of IVF and embryonic stem cell research as well. good luck fighting for that :D

While I appeal to a person's moral integrity (for without it, anything goes, including rape, slavery and murder), my premise is that *scientifically* a new human being comes into existence at conception. All of my arguments, whether based on logic alone or logic w/ emotion, are based on the premise that life begins at conception.

What do you feel would be a "stronger" premise? :)

It's an offensive issue, regardless of which angle I take. Simply being prolife makes this article offensive. :)

haha Yes, you're right about that. :) But as Dr. Oz said on OPRAH, the embryonic stem cell debate is already dead. The success of stem cell research thus far has come from adult stem cells. Embryonic stem cell "treatment" has only resulted in brain tumors and other such counterproductive byproducts. Not to mention the "cannibalism" of injecting embryo (human) tissue into your body.

While I sympathize greatly with people suffering the ongoing heartbreak of infertility, I believe it is unethical to create several embryos (new human beings) fully knowing the majority will have to be sacrificed in the hopes that only one or two might implant.